MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070330373 · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.063817

Effects of phase fluctuations of a laser on the dynamics of an atom in metallic cavities

2001· article· en· W2070330373 on OpenAlexfundno aff
V. V. Paranjape, P. V. Panat, S. V. Lawande

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMechanical and Optical Resonators
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity Grants CommissionCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
KeywordsPhysicsAtom (system on chip)Dissipative systemLaserAtom laserAtomic physicsPhase (matter)Dynamics (music)DipoleDiffusionOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the effects of phase fluctuations of a laser on the dynamics of a two-level atom. We assume that the atom is in a cavity and consider two cases in which the atom is either sandwiched between two parallel metal plates or placed inside a rectangular metallic waveguide. We use the well-known master equation and utilize the phase diffusion model for our analysis. We derive expressions for the dipolar and dissipative forces acting on the atom. We then show that the laser fluctuations produce an increase in the magnitude of the dissipative force and a reduction in the dipolar force. We illustrate that the atom-laser interaction gives rise to a potential, which binds the atom to the central part of the cavity. We also show that the atomic velocity produces significant changes on the potential and on the force acting on the atom. The combined effects of the velocity and laser fluctuations on the atomic motion are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicMechanical and Optical ResonatorsFrench-language works237,207