MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070349998 · doi:10.1021/ac034275j

A Tool for Studying Contact Electrification in Systems Comprising Metals and Insulating Polymers

2003· article· en· W2070349998 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jason A. Wiles, Bartosz A. Grzybowski, Adam Winkleman, George M. Whitesides

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsContact electrificationChemistryPolymerPolyethyleneSPHERESContact angleChemical physicsElectrodeCore (optical fiber)FerromagnetismShell (structure)Composite materialNanotechnologyCondensed matter physicsTriboelectric effectMaterials sciencePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe an analytical system for in situ measurement of the charge that develops by contact electrification when a ferromagnetic sphere rolls on the surface of a polymer. This system makes it possible to survey the ability of polymeric surfaces to charge by contact electrification. Because the measurement of charge using this tool does not require physical contact of the charged sphere with the measuring electrode, it also enables the kinetics of charging to be examined. The research has focused on the contact charging of spheres having a core-and-shell geometry (a common core of ferromagnetic steel, and a variable shell of thin films of metals, or metals with surface oxides) rolling on the surface of polymeric slabs; it has generated an internally consistent set of data that include the polarity and magnitude of charging for a homologous series of polymers that differ chemically in the pendant group on a polyethylene backbone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations121
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207