MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070353062 · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a3652

Rehashing Trial Results Won't Help with Puzzling Aneurysms–Patients Need Best Care within a Contemporary Trial

2013· letter· en· W2070353062 on OpenAlexaff
Tim E. Darsaut, Jean Raymond

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalHealth Sciences CentreHôpital Notre-DameUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialMEDLINESurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We would like to air our concerns regarding 2 recent publications in the American Journal of Neuroradiology: a meta-analysis of coil embolization versus clipping for ruptured aneurysms[1][1] and the accompanying editorial entitled “Best Evidence: Comments on Meta-Analysis of Coiling versus

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.041
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.255
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0410.255
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0680.059
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of NeuroradiologySame topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207