Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le roman de l’écrivaine canadienne Margaret Atwood Oryx & Crake (2003) poursuit la réflexion sur le « posthumain » entreprise il y a presque un siècle par Karel Capek dans R.U.R . Les Crakers, espèce posthumaine artificielle, vivent dans un bonheur prélapsaire après la quasi-extinction de l’humanité, dans l’ignorance de la paternité et des fléaux que, selon leur concepteur, elle engendre. En cela, leur créateur a accompli une tendance de fond du XX e siècle : le harcèlement de la fonction paternelle, bien décrit par la psychanalyse. Mais l’ironie du roman est de montrer comment ces créatures échappent à son emprise : en inventant mythes et rituels qui replaceront au principe de leur vie un Autre, repère symbolique dont l’autorité leur permet de s’émanciper d’une condition pensée comme immuable par leur inventeur. Par quoi Oryx & Crake oppose les humanités, dont la fonction est la connaissance et l’émancipation, aux techniques et à leur pouvoir, heureusement faillible, d’assujettissement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".