Fibrinolytic response to venous occlusion is decreased in patients after Kawasaki disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Impaired fibrinolysis is considered a sensitive marker of endothelial dysfunction. Persistent endothelial dysfunction occurs in some patients following Kawasaki disease. The aim of the present study was to assess whether impaired fibrinolysis is present in long-term survivors of Kawasaki disease. The study included 42 children with a documented history of Kawasaki disease presenting with or without coronary lesions, and 26 healthy controls. Blood samples were collected from patients and controls prior to and following venous occlusion stress testing. Significantly decreased fibrinolytic response to venous occlusion was detected in patients compared with controls due to decreased tissue plasminogen activator. In addition, patients had significantly increased plasma concentrations of plasminogen and fibrinogen, which were related to similar increases of alpha2 -macroglobulin. Decreased fibrinolytic response was found in patients with coronary aneurysms but also in those without coronary lesions. In summary, a decreased fibrinolytic response to venous occlusion may reflect persistent endothelial damage following acute Kawasaki disease, potentially predisposing these patients to accelerated atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease in early adult life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".