Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dès le début des années 1980, le British Museum a mis en place une politique d’acquisition d’oeuvres contemporaines « du Moyen-Orient ». Les oeuvres acquises sont successivement exposées avec les objets d’art islamique historique du musée réunis dans la galerie John Addis. Ce choix sous-entend que ces oeuvres contemporaines prolongeraient l’« art islamique » aujourd’hui. En revenant sur l’histoire de la galerie John Addis et de ses collections d’art « islamique », historique et contemporain, cet article montre que le choix fait par le British Museum d’exposer sa collection d’« art contemporain du Moyen-Orient » à côté d’objets de l’art islamique historique réactive non seulement la notion de « civilisation islamique » mais suppose également de façon tout aussi problématique l’existence d’une « essence islamique ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".