MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070441659 · doi:10.1097/ypg.0b013e3283208091

Development and validation of the high-quality ‘rapid method for swab’ to genotype the HTTLPR serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) promoter polymorphism

2009· article· en· W2070441659 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric Genetics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsBuccal swabGenotypingGenotypeDNA extractiongenomic DNAAmpliconBiologyPolymerase chain reactionDNAMedicineGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The importance of genetic variation to the etiology of neuropsychiatric disorders is well established and is currently being examined for diagnosis and treatment. The most popular method of obtaining material for genotype analysis, high-yielding DNA extraction from blood, has several limitations, including invasiveness, need for skilled individuals to collect material, and requirement for cold storage. Saliva sampling is noninvasive and trained personnel are less necessary, but it still requires a relatively high level of subject compliance. Buccal mucosa cells sampling is almost completely noninvasive, reducing compliance issues significantly. Samples collected have been shown to produce usable DNA after shipment through conventional mail. The DNA produced by rapid elution of these swabs in chaotropic buffers is, however, of limited quality and low purity. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to develop a rapid, economical, and environmentally safe method for extraction of high-quality genomic DNA, which can be used to determine clinically important genotypes from trace quantity samples and which has sufficient yield for multiple assays. METHODS: We developed a method of extracting high-quality genomic DNA from buccal swab, which we termed the 'rapid method for swab' (RMS). We compared RMS with two established procedures, specifically the original rapid method and the commercially available Buccal Amp method. We assessed the generated genomic DNAs by their (i) quality, (ii) quantity, (iii) restriction enzyme digestibility, and (iv) PCR-based genotyping in addition to time, cost, and environmental impact of the procedures. MAIN RESULTS: DNA generated by RMS was of higher purity than that by Buccal Amp. RMS is nonenzymatic and does not use strong chaotropic salts or extreme pH. We also showed the suitability of RMS-DNA for LA/LG genotyping as generated by PCR using 7-deaza-dGTP. CONCLUSION: The RMS procedure is novel, efficient, safe, and yields sufficient material for multiple genotyping analyses. The RMS produces DNA of high quality from a single human buccal swab. RMS is a noninvasive technique and particularly suitable for children and older individuals and in field collection settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it