MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070481877 · doi:10.1159/000206984

Identical Twin Marrow Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

2009· article· en· W2070481877 on OpenAlexaff
Elliott F. Osserman, Leonard B. DiRe, John J. DiRe, William H. Sherman, J. Hersman, Rainer Storb

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Haematologica · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMisericordia Community Hospital
FundersCYTED Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo
KeywordsMedicineMelphalanMultiple myelomaCyclophosphamidePrednisoneAsymptomaticBone marrowTotal body irradiationExacerbationChemotherapyTransplantationSurgeryPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We performed the first successful syngeneic bone marrow transplantation (BM Txp) in a patient with multiple myeloma. The patient and his normal identical twin are 50-year-old physicians. Prior to BM Txp, a partial remission was achieved with 1 year of continuous low dosage melphalan and prednisone therapy. Immediately before BM Txp, high dose cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation were administered in an attempt to eradicate the residual tumor. For 17 months after BM Txp, the patient was asymptomatic and hematologically normal although a low concentration of serum monoclonal IgGK persisted. In the 18th month, recurrence of bone pain and increase in the monoclonal IgG signalled exacerbation of the disease. Chemotherapy was resumed and again produced objective and subjective evidence of response. This study demonstrates the feasibility and potential usefulness of syngeneic BM Txp in myeloma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa HaematologicaSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207