Au service de l'argumentation : le classement des figures chez Guillaume Tardif
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Rhetoricae artis ac oratoriae facultatis compendium de Guillaume Tardif est la seconde rhétorique intégrale en langue latine à être publiée par un auteur français. Remaniée dans trois éditions postérieures, elle témoigne d'un intérêt profond pour la tradition oratoire et d'un désir pressant de l'adapter aux besoins contemporains. Tardif montre sa plus grande originalité dans le classement des figures : les divisant selon leur convenance aux différentes parties du discours, il essaie d'envisager le style en fonction du contenu, restaurant ainsi à la rhétorique son unité perdue. Cette ingénieuse tentative a été reprise par Pierre Fabri dans son Grand et Vray Art de pleine rhétorique (1521). L'influence de Tardif a cessé quand le travail de Fabri fut éclipsé dans la deuxième moitié du XVIe siècle par la nouvelle rhétorique ramiste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".