MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070508857 · doi:10.1017/s0373463307004043

A Spatial Indexing Approach for High Performance Location Based Services

2006· article· en· W2070508857 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Navigation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMRF Geosystems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadtreeSearch engine indexingComputer scienceLocation-based serviceIndex (typography)Space partitioningTree (set theory)R-treeData miningService (business)Spatial databaseLinear subspaceQR decompositionDatabaseInformation retrievalSpatial analysisAlgorithmComputer networkGeographyWorld Wide WebMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid development of positioning technology, wireless communication and mobile devices has given rise to the exciting Location Based Services (LBS) thus significantly influencing existing navigational procedures. Motivated by the increasing need to search efficiently through a huge number of service locations (e.g. restaurants, hotels, shops, and more), this paper presents an efficient spatial index QR-tree, a hybrid index structure of Quadtree and R-tree, instead of the exhaustive search to improve the performance in response to user queries. QR-tree consists of two levels: the upper level is a Quadtree residing in the main memory which partitions the data space and the lower level is disk-resident R-trees assigned to the subspaces resulting from the partitioning process. Computational experiments show that the hybrid index structure is able to reduce query response time by up to 30% and achieve significant improvement on data update over the conventional indexing methods, thereby providing an effective option for efficient navigation services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it