MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070518194 · doi:10.1210/jcem.86.10.7906

Osteopontin and Its Receptor αvβ<sub>3</sub>Integrin Are Coexpressed in the Human Endometrium during the Menstrual Cycle But Regulated Differentially

2001· article· en· W2070518194 on OpenAlexaff
K.B.C. Apparao, Michael J. Murray, Marc A. Fritz, William R. Meyer, Ann F. Chambers, Palestrina Truong, Bruce A. Lessey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Dental Protein Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
KeywordsOsteopontinBiologyIntegrinIn situ hybridizationNorthern blotEndometriumEndocrinologyInternal medicineMolecular biologyReceptorMessenger RNAMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteopontin is an arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-containing acidic glycoprotein component of the extracellular matrix that is postulated to bind to integrin receptors at the cell surface to mediate cellular adhesion and migration during embryo implantation. The primary aim of this study was to examine the uterine expression of osteopontin throughout the menstrual cycle in normal fertile controls sampled prospectively based on urinary LH surge detection. Expression of osteopontin was documented using Northern blot analysis, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. Furthermore, the temporal pattern of osteopontin expression was compared with that of its receptor, the alphavbeta3 integrin. Using Ishikawa cells, a well differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line, the in vitro regulation of osteopontin and its receptor alphavbeta3 integrin was studied. By Northern blot analysis, osteopontin mRNA appears during the early secretory phase, with maximal expression occurring in mid to late secretory-phase endometrium. The in situ hybridization analyses showed that osteopontin mRNA specifically localized in epithelial cells within the endometrium. Immunostaining of osteopontin was detected in the glandular secretions and on the apical portions of surface (luminal) epithelium. The patterns of expression of osteopontin by Northern blotting, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry are remarkably similar to the pattern for the alphavbeta3 integrin. Despite these similarities in distribution, in vitro studies demonstrate that osteopontin and beta3 integrin subunit expression are differentially regulated. The expression of osteopontin was primarily induced in response to progesterone, whereas the beta3 integrin subunit was up-regulated by epidermal growth factor or heparin-binding epidermal growth factor. The differential regulation of these two endometrial proteins suggests the existence of two separate pathways regulating epithelial gene expression in human endometrium during the window of implantation. In adhesion assays using Ishikawa cells, alphavbeta3 but not alphavbeta5 or beta1 integrins appear to be the primary receptors for osteopontin. These findings may better define the factors that favor the development of a receptive endometrium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations196
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismSame topicBone and Dental Protein StudiesFrench-language works237,207