MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070519837 · doi:10.1021/ja9086352

Thermodynamics of Halogen Bonding in Solution: Substituent, Structural, and Solvent Effects

2010· article· en· W2070519837 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHalogen bondSubstituentHalogenHydrogen bondComputational chemistryLewis acids and basesAcceptorSolvent effectsSolventPhysical chemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A detailed study of the thermodynamics of the halogen-bonding interaction in organic solution is presented. (19)F NMR titrations are used to determine association constants for the interactions of a variety of Lewis bases with fluorinated iodoalkanes and iodoarenes. Linear free energy relationships for the halogen bond donor ability of substituted iodoperfluoroarenes XC(6)F(4)I are described, demonstrating that both substituent constants (sigma) and calculated molecular electrostatic potential surfaces are useful for constructing such relationships. An electrostatic model is, however, limited in its ability to provide correlation with a more comprehensive data set in which both halogen bond donor and acceptor abilities are varied: the ability of computationally derived binding energies to accurately model such data is elucidated. Solvent effects also reveal limitations of a purely electrostatic depiction of halogen bonding and point to important differences between halogen bonding and hydrogen bonding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it