Les Erotica pathémata de Parthénios de Nicée : des esquisses de poétique accentuelle signées d'acrostiches numériques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Erotica pathemata are not only an erudite compilation in prose, they are a poetic collection. Parthenius makes use of new rhythmic features of the language of his epoch : the evolution of the Greek language has replaced a quantitative rhythm, based on the length of syllables, by an accentual rhythm, based on the repetition of an accent of stressed words. With various ways, Parthenius tests the association of the following poetic devices : equality of number of accentuated syllables between cola or stanzas, repetition of the same accentuated clausula (with a ring-composition or in alternation), equal number of syllables in the corresponding stanzas or cola, assonances at the end of cola. Numerical acrostichs at the beginning or at the end of several texts guarantee the actuality of the segmentation in cola and the pertinence of the rhythmic features that have been discovered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".