MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070527536 · doi:10.3406/reg.2008.7891

Les Erotica pathémata de Parthénios de Nicée : des esquisses de poétique accentuelle signées d'acrostiches numériques

2008· article· en· W2070527536 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des Études Grecques · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsCanadian Linguistic Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhythmRepetition (rhetorical device)PoetryStress (linguistics)ArtLinguisticsSign (mathematics)LiteratureMathematicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Erotica pathemata are not only an erudite compilation in prose, they are a poetic collection. Parthenius makes use of new rhythmic features of the language of his epoch : the evolution of the Greek language has replaced a quantitative rhythm, based on the length of syllables, by an accentual rhythm, based on the repetition of an accent of stressed words. With various ways, Parthenius tests the association of the following poetic devices : equality of number of accentuated syllables between cola or stanzas, repetition of the same accentuated clausula (with a ring-composition or in alternation), equal number of syllables in the corresponding stanzas or cola, assonances at the end of cola. Numerical acrostichs at the beginning or at the end of several texts guarantee the actuality of the segmentation in cola and the pertinence of the rhythmic features that have been discovered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it