MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070543702 · doi:10.1021/jp511987y

Recovery of Bulk Proton Magnetization and Sensitivity Enhancement in Ultrafast Magic-Angle Spinning Solid-State NMR

2015· article· en· W2070543702 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jean‐Philippe Demers, Vinesh Vijayan, Adam Lange

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMax-Planck-GesellschaftLeibniz-GemeinschaftDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Commission
KeywordsMagic angle spinningSolid-state nuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials scienceMagnetizationSensitivity (control systems)SpinningProtonMagic angleUltrashort pulseNuclear magnetic resonanceMAGIC (telescope)Solid-stateNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyPhysicsOpticsChemistryPhysical chemistryNuclear physicsMagnetic fieldComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sensitivity of solid-state NMR experiments is limited by the proton magnetization recovery delay and by the duty cycle of the instrument. Ultrafast magic-angle spinning (MAS) can improve the duty cycle by employing experiments with low-power radio frequency (RF) irradiation which reduce RF heating. On the other hand, schemes to reduce the magnetization recovery delay have been proposed for low MAS rates, but the enhancements rely on selective transfers where the bulk of the (1)H magnetization pool does not contribute to the transfer. We demonstrate here that significant sensitivity enhancements for selective and broadband experiments are obtained at ultrafast MAS by preservation and recovery of bulk (1)H magnetization. We used [(13)C, (15)N]-labeled glutamine as a model compound, spinning in a 1.3 mm rotor at a MAS frequency of 65 kHz. Using low-power (1)H RF (13.4 kHz), we obtain efficient (1)H spin locking and (1)H-(13)C decoupling at ultrafast MAS. As a result, large amounts of (1)H magnetization, from 35% to 42% of the initial polarization, are preserved after cross-polarization and decoupling. Restoring this magnetization to the longitudinal axis using a flip-back pulse leads to an enhancement of the sensitivity, an increase ranging from 14% to 21% in the maximal achievable sensitivity regime and from 24% to 50% in the fast pulsing regime, and to a shortening of the optimal recycling delay to 68% of its original duration. The analysis of the recovery and sensitivity curves reveals that the sensitivity gains do not rely on a selective transfer where few protons contribute but rather on careful conservation of bulk (1)H magnetization. This makes our method compatible with broadband experiments and uniformly labeled materials, in contrast to the enhancement schemes proposed for low MAS. We tested seven different cross-polarization schemes and determined that recovery of bulk (1)H magnetization is a general method for sensitivity enhancement. The physical insight gained about the behavior of proton magnetization sharing under spin lock will be helpful to break further sensitivity boundaries, when even higher external magnetic fields and faster spinning rates are employed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207