MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070555215 · doi:10.1063/1.2358941

Ablation of molecular solids under nanosecond laser pulses: The role of inertial confinement

2006· article· en· W2070555215 on OpenAlex
Danny Pérez, Laurent J. Lewis, Patrick Lorazo, Michel Meunier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversité de MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanosecondNucleationInertial confinement fusionLaser ablationMolecular dynamicsMaterials scienceLaserAblationChemical physicsMolecular physicsCondensed matter physicsOpticsChemistryThermodynamicsPhysicsComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thermal routes to ablation in molecular solids having a long (micron scale) optical penetration depth are investigated under nanosecond laser pulses using a two-dimensional molecular-dynamics model. The authors demonstrate that the mechanisms of matter removal are mainly determined by the local degree of inertial confinement; by increasing level of confinement, these are (trivial) fragmentation, phase explosion, and heterogeneous nucleation of vapor bubbles at solid-liquid boundaries. The thermodynamic pathways to ablation are shown to be different from those predicted by the model of Miotello and Kelly [Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 3535 (1995); Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 69, S67 (1999)].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it