MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070568243 · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/779/1/l6

THREE-DIMENSIONAL STELLAR KINEMATICS AT THE GALACTIC CENTER: MEASURING THE NUCLEAR STAR CLUSTER SPATIAL DENSITY PROFILE, BLACK HOLE MASS, AND DISTANCE

2013· article· en· W2070568243 on OpenAlexaff
Tuan Do, Gregory D. Martinez, S. Yelda, A. M. Ghez, James S. Bullock, Manoj Kaplinghat, Jessica R. Lu, Annika H. G. Peter, K. Phifer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsStellar densityStar clusterGalactic CenterStellar kinematicsStellar dynamicsMass segregationBlack hole (networking)Milky WayStarsStellar massCluster (spacecraft)Globular clusterAstronomyStar formation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present 3D kinematic observations of stars within the central 0.5 pc of\nthe Milky Way nuclear star cluster using adaptive optics imaging and\nspectroscopy from the Keck telescopes. Recent observations have shown that the\ncluster has a shallower surface density profile than expected for a dynamically\nrelaxed cusp, leading to important implications for its formation and\nevolution. However, the true three dimensional profile of the cluster is\nunknown due to the difficulty in de-projecting the stellar number counts. Here,\nwe use spherical Jeans modeling of individual proper motions and radial\nvelocities to constrain for the first time, the de-projected spatial density\nprofile, cluster velocity anisotropy, black hole mass ($M_\\mathrm{BH}$), and\ndistance to the Galactic center ($R_0$) simultaneously. We find that the inner\nstellar density profile of the late-type stars, $\\rho(r)\\propto r^{-\\gamma}$ to\nhave a power law slope $\\gamma=0.05_{-0.60}^{+0.29}$, much more shallow than\nthe frequently assumed Bahcall $\\&$ Wolf slope of $\\gamma=7/4$. The measured\nslope will significantly affect dynamical predictions involving the cluster,\nsuch as the dynamical friction time scale. The cluster core must be larger than\n0.5 pc, which disfavors some scenarios for its origin. Our measurement of\n$M_\\mathrm{BH}=5.76_{-1.26}^{+1.76}\\times10^6$ $M_\\odot$ and\n$R_0=8.92_{-0.55}^{+0.58}$ kpc is consistent with that derived from stellar\norbits within 1$^{\\prime\\prime}$ of Sgr A*. When combined with the orbit of\nS0-2, the uncertainty on $R_0$ is reduced by 30% ($8.46_{-0.38}^{+0.42}$ kpc).\nWe suggest that the MW NSC can be used in the future in combination with\nstellar orbits to significantly improve constraints on $R_0$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207