MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070575087 · doi:10.1504/ijcat.2007.017235

Point-cloud simplification with bounded geometric deviations

2007· article· en· W2070575087 on OpenAlexaff
Hao Song, Hsi Yung Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computer Applications in Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint cloudPartition (number theory)PiecewiseBounded functionMathematicsConstraint (computer-aided design)Point (geometry)AlgorithmUpper and lower boundsSet (abstract data type)Computer scienceGeometryCombinatoricsMathematical analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new method for point cloud simplification. The method searches for a subset of the original point cloud data such that the maximum geometric deviation between the original and simplified data sets is below a specified error bound. The underlying principle of the simplification process is to partition the original data set into piecewise point clusters and represent each cluster by a single point. By iteratively updating the partition and efficiently evaluating the resulting geometric deviations, the proposed method is able to yield a simplified point cloud that satisfies the error bound constraint and contains near minimum number of data points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Computer Applications in TechnologySame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207