The Role of Regulations and Ethics Auditing to Cope with Information Technology Governance from Point View Internal Auditors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the requirements of the IT internal audit from the standpoint of corporate governance in terms of the regulations, instructions and ethics with the addition of the idea of the existence of internal auditing offices. Questionnaire was used as a tool to get the information was distributed to the internal auditors in the Jordanian commercial banks have been using the system for Likert, hypotheses were tested using sample t-test with the acceptance of these alternative hypotheses and reject hypotheses nihilism. The most important results of this study: that the regulations and the company adapted to the social conditions to ensure good implementation by her staff, and assess the degree to submit to the rules and regulations and amendments thereto staff and especially the financial and accounting by the internal auditor, and help offices internal audit of the external auditor to give professional opinion more clearly and independently, and the presence of activating the role of the government through the availability of qualified professionals in the process of issuing laws and language understandable in conjunction with non-state actors and the relevant accounting and auditing. The most important recommendations of the study: the application of international standards on ethics functional audit such as: integration, objectivity, and independence, and mutual trust, and the holding of specialized conferences to sensitize stakeholders to promote the concept of corporate governance and their impact on the vision and mission of the banks, and that is reviewed laws and regulations from time to time in order to ensure them and their suitability for business and new companies out of business and activities through various technological developments, both internally and externally effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.043 | 0.059 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".