Polyene Cyclization by a Double Intramolecular Heck Reaction. A DFT Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A density functional theory (DFT) model study has been carried out on the cyclization of aryl polyene triflate catalyzed by a Pd(II)-BINAP complex in a Heck type reaction. In the model study, the catalyst was represented by Pd(PH 2 (CH) 4 PH 2 ), whereas the aryl polyene triflate substrate was simplified by replacing the dimethoxy naphthalene fragment with hydrogens. Formally, this cyclization reaction consists of an intramolecular Heck reaction with two olefin insertions, also known as a double or cascade Heck reaction. The postulated cationic pathway for aryl triflate substrates has been explored as the reaction mechanism. The study has mainly focused on the two migratory insertion steps, where the identity of the final reaction products is decided. At both steps two distinct insertions may occur: exo, or 1,2-insertion, and endo, or 2,1-insertion. The computation of the possible intermediates and transition states demonstrated that the first insertion is exo-selective, with an energy barrier of only 4.1 kcal/mol, while the second insertion is endo-selective, involving a much higher energy barrier of 22.8 kcal/mol. The calculated subsequent preference for exo and endo selectivity is in good agreement with qualitative experimental observation. According to our results, the main factor controlling the exo/endo selectivity, at both the thermodynamic and the kinetic levels, is the relative stability of the cyclic system resulting from the migratory insertion. Furthermore, a furan ring present in the substrate can play an important role by forming a stable and inert π-complex that is able to suppress subsequent migratory insertion steps. On the other hand, taking into account the solvent effects using a continuum model, we found that the exo/endo selectivity of the first insertion step is solvent-dependent. As the polarity of the solvent increases, the relative stability of the endo intermediate also increases, in good agreement with the available experimental data. The β-elimination steps affording the final reaction products were also investigated. The results show that the β-elimination on the endo intermediates is thermodynamically favored over the β-elimination on the exo intermediates. On the other hand, the results for the β-elimination on the endo intermediates show that this reaction is highly reversible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".