L’annonce et la préparation de Vatican II : Réception et horizon d’attente au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’étude de la réception de l’annonce de Vatican II, au Québec, au cours des années 1959-1960 est éclairante pour nous faire comprendre le retournement occasionné par l’annonce du Concile dans la vie de l’Église du Québec, surtout à partir de 1962 où cette Église s’engagera résolument dans le projet conciliaire de Jean XXIII. L’étude de la réception de l’annonce de Vatican II dans les quotidiens francophones distribués au Québec n’est pas moins significative. La presse catholique, et en particulier L’Action catholique , se montre d’abord très réservée à l’égard du Concile. À l’opposé, la presse indépendante de l’Église se montrera très favorable au projet. Quant aux milieux intellectuels, ils commenceront à formuler des attentes à l’égard du Concile, en 1960.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".