What??s new in systemic therapy for endometrial cancer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecologic cancers. Most women present with early disease that is curable. In women with poor prognostic factors or advanced disease, survival is greatly diminished. Recently there have been several trials of adjuvant treatment and treatment for advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. These trials of systemic therapy will be reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Several areas have been the focus of recent literature on systemic therapy for endometrial cancer. These include large phase III trials of multi-agent chemotherapy regimens for advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer, combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments, and novel targeted agents. SUMMARY: New approaches to combining the traditional adjuvant modalities for high-risk endometrial cancer as well as combining new novel agents with traditional chemotherapeutics will improve patient outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it