MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070639889 · doi:10.7202/039181ar

Conception d’un système hypermédia d’enseignement adaptatif centré sur les styles d’apprentissage : modèle et expérience

2009· article· fr· W2070639889 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicLearning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesLearning stylesPhilosophyPsychologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article traite de style d’apprentissage en tant que critère d’adaptation d’un cours en ligne. Une première étape consiste à choisir le modèle des styles d’apprentissage. La sélection de ces styles est réalisée par un questionnaire dédié. D’autre part, les activités d’apprentissage sont conçues afin de refléter les dimensions liées aux styles d’apprentissage. Enfin, la présentation de ces activités est gérée par un module d’adaptation probabiliste. En nous appuyant sur les méthodes et les techniques proposées pour la modélisation et l’adaptation, nous avons conçu un système hypermédia d’enseignement adaptatif centré sur les styles d’apprentissage. L’approche a été validée expérimentalement et les résultats obtenus sont encourageants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it