MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070663827 · doi:10.1191/095968300672141865

Postglacial water-level changes of a small lake in southern Québec, Canada

2000· article· en· W2070663827 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Martin Lavoie, Pierre J. H. Richard

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Holocene · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité LavalCenter for Northern Studies
FundersBijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGentNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMacrofossilWater levelGeologyMarlPaleolimnologyTransectPhysical geographyPreborealHolocenePeatPeriod (music)SedimentDeposition (geology)CobbleSubarctic climateOceanographyPaleontologyYounger DryasGeographyEcologyArchaeologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sediment stratigraphy and palaeobotanical data from five cores were used to reconstruct the postglacial water-level changes of a small lake in southern Québec. The cores were taken along two transects from the centre of the lake to the margins. Lake level was relatively high before 11 000 cal. BP, when sedimen tation was characterized by the deposition of silty gyttja (.13 000 cal. BP) and marl (13 000–11 000 cal. BP). From 11 000 to 7000 cal. BP, a sediment hiatus was indicated by the lack of two regional pollen zones between the marl and the overlying gyttja, suggesting either nondeposition or erosion of the previously deposited sedi ments due to a low lake level. The lake level was approximately 2 m lower than present on the basis of macrofossil assemblages. A rise in the water level of about 1 m occurred around 7000 cal. BP, which was interrupted by a second lowering between 6100 and 4400 cal. BP, as indicated by a hiatus in the pollen stratigra phy. During this low period, the water level was at least 2 m lower than present. The last 4400 years are characterized by a continuous rise. The lake-level fluctuations are broadly synchronous with other palaeo hydrological records in northeastern United States, Ontario, and Subarctic Québec, implying broad-scale climatic control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe HoloceneSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207