Structural and functional properties of the HIV-1 RNA???tRNA 3 Lys primer complex annealed by the nucleocapsid protein: Comparison with the heat-annealed complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conversion of the single-stranded RNA genome into double-stranded DNA by virus-coded reverse transcriptase (RT) is an essential step of the retrovirus life cycle. In human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), RT uses the cellular tRNA(Lys)3 to initiate the (-) strand DNA synthesis. Placement of the primer tRNA(Lys)3 involves binding of its 3'-terminal 18 nt to a complementary region of genomic RNA termed PBS. However, the PBS sequence is not the unique determinant of primer usage and additional contacts are important. This placement is believed to be achieved in vivo by the nucleocapsid domain of Gag or by the mature protein NCp. Up to now, structural information essentially arose from heat-annealed primer-template complexes (Isel et al., J Mol Biol, 1995, 247:236-250; Isel et al., EMBO J, 1999, 18:1038-1048). Here, we investigated the formation of the primer-template complex mediated by NCp and compared structural and functional properties of heat- and NCp-annealed complexes. We showed that both heat- and NCp-mediated procedures allow comparable high yields of annealing. Then, we investigated structural features of both kinds of complexes by enzymatic probing, and we compared their relative efficiency in (-) strong stop DNA synthesis. We did not find any significant differences between these complexes, suggesting that information derived from the heat-annealed complex can be transposed to the NCp-mediated complex and most likely to complexes formed in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".