MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070689312 · doi:10.1021/ac802726a

Absolute Quantification of Potential Cancer Markers in Clinical Tissue Homogenates Using Multiple Reaction Monitoring on a Hybrid Triple Quadrupole/Linear Ion Trap Tandem Mass Spectrometer

2009· article· en· W2070689312 on OpenAlexaff
Leroi V. DeSouza, Alexander D. Romaschin, Terence J. Colgan, K. W. Michael Siu

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalMount Sinai Hospital
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsChemistryTriple quadrupole mass spectrometerQuadrupole ion trapTandemIon trapSelected reaction monitoringTandem mass spectrometryIonQuadrupoleHybrid mass spectrometerMass spectrometryQuadrupole mass analyzerAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multidimensional liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry with iTRAQ-labeling typically used for differential expression analysis in biomarker discovery does not always detect peptides from these biomarkers in all samples analyzed. Herein we describe the results of targeted analyses using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) on a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion-trap tandem mass spectrometer. The MRM approach when combined with the newly released mTRAQ reagent, a non-isobaric variant of the iTRAQ tag available in two versions, enables absolute quantification of peptides and proteins via isotope-dilution mass spectrometry. This approach was applied to clinical endometrial tissue homogenates in an effort to quantify two endometrial cancer biomarkers, pyruvate kinase (PK) and polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (PIGR). We successfully demonstrated the feasibility of this approach on 20 individual samples and further verified the differential expressions of these two biomarkers in endometrial carcinoma. PK was determined to be present at an average concentration of 58.33 pmol/mg of total proteins and in the range of 9.13-87.66 pmol/mg in the soluble fraction of the normal proliferative endometrium homogenates. By contrast, the average concentration of PK in the cancer sample homogenates was 237.2 pmol/mg of total proteins and in the range of 66.10-570.9 pmol/mg. PIGR was found to be expressed at an average concentration of 8.85 pmol/mg of total proteins with a range of 1.02-49.61 pmol/mg in the normal proliferative control samples, and an average concentration of 200.2 pmol/mg with a range of 7.63-810.4 pmol/mg in the cancer samples. This study confirmed qualitatively the differential expressions previously observed but also showed that the actual relative differential expressions in these samples were much higher than those reported in the discovery study. These results validated earlier observations of dynamic-range compression in iTRAQ-labeling with hybrid quadrupole/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (DeSouza, L.V. et al. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 3525-3534).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations85
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207