Innovations et enjeux éthiques des politiques environnementales et patrimoniales : l’UNESCO et le conseil de l’Europe
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article tente d’analyser l’évolution des enjeux éthiques des politiques patrimoniales et environnementales de deux organisations pionnières dans l’histoire des relations internationales de la seconde moitié du xxe siècle : l’UNESCO et le Conseil de l’Europe. Prônant une éthique de la paix comme dialogue entre les nations, ces organisations fondent leurs principes éthiques sur le respect de la dignité humaine et des droits de l’Homme comme ordre démocratique au sein des nations souveraines. À partir des normes et de deux programmes phares « nature-culture » (Man and Biosphere, patrimoine mondial), nous nous interrogeons sur les dynamiques éthiques de l’histoire culturelle et écologique et de leurs innovations pour la société comme réponse citoyenne à des défis majeurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it