MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070706846 · doi:10.1353/nin.2004.0015

Major League Champions, 1871-2001 (review)

2004· article· en· W2070706846 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Larry R. Gerlach

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeagueBasketballTrophyFootballAdvertisingScholarshipMedia studiesPolitical scienceHistorySociologyLawArchaeologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Casey Stengel once said, "You could look it up." Thanks to Thomas Brucato, communications specialist and member of the Society for American Baseball Research, you can. Broadly applying the term Major League to the highest levels of professional team sport in North America, Brucato records the annual championships for sixty leagues in eleven team sports—baseball, basketball, football, arena football, lacrosse, indoor lacrosse, hockey, roller hockey, soccer, indoor soccer, and tennis. Here one will find such familiar competitions as the World Series, the Super Bowl, and the Stanley Cup as well as such less well known events as the Scholarship Series (All-American Girls' Baseball League), the Soccer Bowl (North American Soccer League), and the Avco World Trophy (World Hockey Association). Some franchises, such as the New York Yankees, Montreal Canadiens, and Boston Celtics, are famous, while others, [End Page 142] such as the Brooklyn Bridegrooms (baseball), Vancouver Millionaires (hockey), and Akron Firestone Non-Skids (basketball), are obscure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207