MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070726703 · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.116.1.160

Defensive behavior and hippocampal cell proliferation: Differential modulation by naltrexone during stress.

2002· article· en· W2070726703 on OpenAlexaff
Melissa M. Holmes, Liisa A.M. Galea

Bibliographic record

VenueBehavioral Neuroscience · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNaltrexoneEndogenous opioidBromodeoxyuridineHippocampal formationDentate gyrusNarcotic antagonistPsychologyEndocrinologyAntagonistChemistrySalineDifferential effectsPharmacologyInternal medicineNeuroscienceOpioidCell growthMedicineReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study investigated the role of endogenous opioids in the expression of defensive behaviors (DBs) and the suppression of cell proliferation (CP) in the dentate gyrus (DG) induced by exposure to predator odor, trimethyl thiazoline (TMT). Adult male rats were injected with either naltrexone (an opioid antagonist, 5 mg/kg) or saline 30 min before exposure to either TMT or a control odor. Behavior was scored for the first 15 min of odor exposure. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU, 200 mg/kg) was then injected, and the rats were perfused 1 hr later. Exposure to TMT increased the expression of DBs and suppressed the number of proliferating cells in the DG. Pretreatment with naltrexone attenuated the effects of TMT on DB expression but did not attenuate the effects of TMT on CP. In addition, naltrexone administration suppressed CP in the absence of TMT. These results demonstrate a dissociation between DBs and regulation of CP in the DG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations83
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBehavioral NeuroscienceSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207