Coupled core–shell model of magnetoimpedance in wires
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magnetoimpedance (MI) has been studied extensively in soft magnetic wires and plates. Although a general theoretical basis has evolved, several details remain poorly understood. In particular, the amplitude of the effect in the low field region has proven impossible to fit within current models which assume a uniform static magnetization within the material. In this article, we present magnetization and MI data on CoFeSiBNb melt-extracted wires and conclude that the behavior of these materials can be analyzed on the basis of a core–shell magnetic structure. This approach introduces a nonuniform magnetization into the MI theory in such wires. We calculate the static magnetic configuration in the presence of an exchange coupling between the two regions and use it to solve for the dynamical magnetization of the outer shell using the Landau–Lifshitz and Maxwell equations to obtain the impedance as a function of the applied field and frequency. The agreement for the MI between theory and experiment is greatly improved from that of previous models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it