MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070769696 · doi:10.1117/12.516191

Passive standoff detection of radiological products in the thermal infrared region

2004· article· en· W2070769696 on OpenAlexaff
Eldon Puckrin, Jean‐Marc Thériault, Denis Dubé

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingInfraredRadiometryOpticsMaterials scienceEnvironmental sciencePhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An investigation is made into the possibility of applying the passive standoff detection technique to the identification of radiological and related products. This work is based on laboratory measurements of the diffuse reflectance from a number of radiological or related products, including U<sub>3</sub>O<sub>8</sub>, ThO<sub>2</sub>, CsI, SrO, I<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and La<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. With the use of these measured reflectances, simulations of the nadir radiances with the various types of surface reflectances were carried out with the MODTRAN4 transmission model. The simulations were performed for two types of scenarios; at an altitude of 1 m above the ground for the purpose of simulating the passive detection of nuclear products with a hand-held instrument, and at an altitude of 1 km to emulate the conditions of a passive sensor carried aloft in an aircraft. The results of the simulations under idealized conditions show that there is a good potential for being able to measure radiological products or related materials by passive standoff detection using Fourier-transform infrared radiometric techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207