MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070801510 · doi:10.1002/ceat.200390014

Simulation of Pipeline Slurry Flow under Conditions of Granular Phase Ablation

2003· article· en· W2070801510 on OpenAlex
Dmitry Eskin, Yuri Leonenko, Oleg Vinogradov

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering & Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlurryMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Suspension (topology)Two-phase flowMaterials scienceVolumetric flow rateGranular materialMass transferChemistryMathematicsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A model of granular flow in the regime of a moving bed under conditions of granular phase ablation is developed. The model is based on the well‐known two‐layer representation of stratified slurry flow, which assumes a dynamic equilibrium between the bottom (granular) layer and the upper layer of solids‐liquid suspension. The mass transfer rate from the bottom layer to the upper one is defined on the basis of digestion model for a single spherical lump. The model developed allows estimation of the lengths required for the total digestion of lumps in a moving bed and the axial pressure gradient distribution for different flow regimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it