Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| July 01, 2002 Ediacaran epifaunal tiering M.E. Clapham; M.E. Clapham 1Department of Geological Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar G.M. Narbonne G.M. Narbonne 1Department of Geological Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information M.E. Clapham 1Department of Geological Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada G.M. Narbonne 1Department of Geological Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 14 Dec 2001 Revision Received: 15 Mar 2002 Accepted: 22 Mar 2002 First Online: 02 Jun 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2682 Print ISSN: 0091-7613 Geological Society of America Geology (2002) 30 (7): 627–630. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0627:EET>2.0.CO;2 Article history Received: 14 Dec 2001 Revision Received: 15 Mar 2002 Accepted: 22 Mar 2002 First Online: 02 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation M.E. Clapham, G.M. Narbonne; Ediacaran epifaunal tiering. Geology 2002;; 30 (7): 627–630. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0627:EET>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract Epifaunal tiering, the subdivision of vertical space within a community, is a fundamental attribute of Phanerozoic suspension-feeding communities. This paper documents tiering, including the presence of meter-tall organisms, in Neoproterozoic Ediacaran communities. Ediacaran tiering was studied from three exceptionally preserved deep-water communities at Mistaken Point, Newfoundland, which contain in situ census populations of hundreds to thousands of organisms. Tiering consists of overlapping populations of dominant organisms and is characterized by gradational, rather than abrupt, tier boundaries. At least three tiers are apparent: a lower level 0–8 cm above the seafloor, an intermediate level between 8–22 cm above the seafloor, and an upper level that extends as high as 120 cm. Tier boundaries are relatively consistent between communities, but the constituent organisms in each level are variable, suggesting that some Ediacaran taxa could fill different tiers interchangeably. Development of a tiered epifaunal structure is consistent with suspension feeding or absorbing dissolved nutrients directly from seawater. Despite the common occurrence of tall organisms, all communities share a similar population structure in which biomass is concentrated in the basal 10 cm above the seafloor. Comparison with shallow-water Ediacaran localities suggests that the observed tiering structure is typical of Ediacaran communities. Ediacaran tierers also show the fundamental subdivision between organisms and/or colonies that fed along their entire length and those that developed a specialized feeding apparatus, implying that the features of Phanerozoic tiered skeletal ecosystems were first initiated in soft-bodied communities in the late Neoproterozoic. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".