MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070889355 · doi:10.1063/1.1445488

A far-infrared beamline for ultrahigh vacuum surface vibrational spectroscopy at Aladdin

2002· article· en· W2070889355 on OpenAlexaff
Roger W. C. Hansen, Robert Julian, Tim Kubala, Robert Bosch, Tim May, Carol J. Hirschmugl

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicScientific Research and Discoveries
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBeamlineOpticsVacuum chamberFar infraredPhysicsStorage ringAperture (computer memory)Materials scienceBeam (structure)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A far-infrared beamline has been implemented on port 031 of the Aladdin Storage Ring. Port 031 has been designed to capture the edge radiation produced by the fringe field of a bending magnet rather than normal bending magnet radiation. Calculations indicate that in cases where the aperture is limited edge radiation provides higher flux than bending magnets, particularly at the longer wavelengths. The far-infrared (IR) beamline shares this port with a mid-IR microscope beamline and uses the same optics to collect and collimate the light. To install the far-IR beamline, a special mirror was designed to deflect light to the purged bench and microscopes or to move out of the light path and allow the light to continue to the far-IR beamline. The vacuum bench employs a Thermo Nicolet interferometer with a solid substrate beamsplitter modified for use under rough vacuum. The light from the interferometer is focused through CsI windows on a sample in an ultrahigh vacuum chamber. The specular reflected light from the sample is collected by an elliptical mirror and focused onto a bolometer detector. The details of the beamline will be discussed as well as the first experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicScientific Research and DiscoveriesFrench-language works237,207