The relative influence of Laurentide and local ice sheets during the last glacial maximum in the eastern Chic-Chocs Range, northern Gaspé Peninsula, Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Geochemical signatures, erratic dispersal, and striae indicate glacial flows in the north-central Gaspé Peninsula exclusively from Appalachian sources, except for the coastal fringe. During the last glacial maximum (LGM), ice from the Monts McGerrigle flowed northward and northwestward over the summits of the eastern Chic-Chocs Range and the coastal plateau to the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Lesser flows also occurred to the north from Mont Albert and the western Chic-Chocs Range. Where intersecting striae were noted, the older flows are associated with a locally developed ice cap. The rare occurrences of striae and erratics, and morphometric and lithological characteristics of summit diamictons, imply limited basal erosion by both local and regional ice caps. This is postulated to result from early protection of rock surfaces by the initial buildup of thin, frozen-based ice in the eastern Chic-Chocs Range. A compact till mantle in the cols and on the coastal plateau and striae parallel to col directions indicate a downslope transition to wet-based ice. Occasional gneiss boulders above the marine limit between Cap-Chat and Sainte-Anne-des-Monts indicate a slight onlap of the Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS), but the latter was excluded from the interior of the peninsula east of Cap-Chat. Whole-rock geochemistry from three granitoid erratics on Chic-Chocs summits and one in the York River basin indicates a local Devonian rather than a Precambrian Canadian Shield source. The absence of southward downwarping of synchronous postglacial marine limits across the Gaspé Peninsula corroborates this view for the LGM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".