MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070907428 · doi:10.1063/1.2942400

Contact effects and extraction of intrinsic parameters in poly(3-alkylthiophene) thin film field-effect transistors

2008· article· en· W2070907428 on OpenAlexaff
M. Jamal Deen, M.H. Kazemeini, Steven Holdcroft

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceThreshold voltageTransistorThin-film transistorOptoelectronicsElectron mobilityVoltageField-effect transistorContact resistanceThermal conductionField effectCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyElectrical engineeringLayer (electronics)PhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on contact effects in polymeric thin film transistors based on poly(3-octylthiophene) and poly(3-hexadecylthiophene) with gold contact electrodes and in the bottom contact configuration. A method to extract the intrinsic channel mobility from the measured extrinsic mobility over a broad range of gate voltage is presented. This method uses the I-V characteristics of the transistor in its reverse mode operation. The results show that the intrinsic mobility in the channel is gate voltage dependent and increases almost linearly with voltages at biases above the threshold voltage. By applying a model based on the theory of space-charge-limited conduction, the dependence of the threshold voltage on the contacts and the shifts observed in this parameter with different polymer film thicknesses are explained. We also apply this model to explain the effects of light in reducing the contact effects and changing the device parameters from extrinsic in the dark to intrinsic under illumination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207