MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070922241 · doi:10.1061/40730(144)103

Use of a Premium SBS ModifiedBitumen to Combat Severe Rutting in Asphalt Pavement

2004· article· en· W2070922241 on OpenAlexaff
Shifa Xu, Zhao‐Hui Zhou, Peizhong Qian, I Deme

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsShell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRutAsphaltAsphalt pavementEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringCivil engineeringEngineeringForensic engineeringMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Severe rutting occurred in a section of National Highway Project A within six weeks of opening to traffic with rut depths observed as deep as 15 cm. The cause of the rutting has been investigated and analyzed and a new binder and asphalt mix specification were proposed to satisfy the requirements for both the heavy traffic and climatic conditions. The rut resistance and water sensitivity of the binder and failed asphalt mix were evaluated first in the laboratory. Specific requirements for a higher performance binder and mix were then proposed and incorporated in the road reconstruction project. This was followed by performance monitoring of the new pavement. The conclusions from the case study are detailed in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207