MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070926155 · doi:10.1109/cca.2012.6402467

Sensitivity analysis for systems of differential-algebraic equations with applications to predictive control and parameter estimation

2012· article· en· W2070926155 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Rauh, Luise Senkel, Harald Aschemann, Nedialko S. Nedialkov, John D. Pryce

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Sensitivity (control systems)Differential algebraic equationModel predictive controlComputationTrajectoryComputer scienceInterconnectionEstimation theoryDifferential equationElectric power systemAlgebraic equationDifferential (mechanical device)Control engineeringPower (physics)MathematicsAlgorithmOrdinary differential equationEngineeringControl (management)Electronic engineeringNonlinear systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Systems of differential-algebraic equations (DAEs) are a natural description for mathematical models of many real-life processes consisting of the interconnection of different physical components with their own dynamic behavior. Such interconnected systems can be described by separate subsystem models, for instance related to electric drives and mechanical components in power trains. Interface conditions are used to connect these subsystems by a description of power flow or, for example, geometric side conditions imposed by links or joints. In this paper, procedures for the computation of state sensitivities with respect to parameters and control inputs are described for DAE formulations of control applications. Procedures for sensitivity analysis are used to investigate the performance of control systems and to derive novel predictive control approaches aiming at accurate trajectory tracking and rejection of external disturbances, as well as procedures for state and parameter estimation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207