Ultrastructure of Cement Lines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bone remodeling is achieved through the resorptive activity of osteoclasts and the synthetic activity of osteoblast and it continues throughout life. Cement lines are formed by osteoblasts and are recognized between old and new bone. However, the detailed structure of cement lines has still not been clarified. The present study researched the ultrastructure of cement lines in a ferret femur using light microscopy (LM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). On LM, many resorption tunnels were recognized in cortical bones. Some osteoclasts in Howship’s lacunae were observed at the top of the resorption tunnel (cutting cone), and osteoblasts forming some layers were recognized behind osteoclasts (filling cone). The layer of osteoid was observed under osteoblasts, and it was slightly eosinophilic on the decalcified specimen. A very thin layer of cement lines was recognized between osteoid and old bone, and it was slightly basophilic on hematoxylin and eosin (HE). On the non-decalcified sections stained with toluidine blue (TB), cement lines showed anochromasia in the non-etched specimen, but stained with TB in the etched one. On TEM, cement lines were recognized between osteoid and old bone, and they were revealed as extracellular matrices of an afibrillar layer, with a thickness of about 2µm. On BSE analysis, cement lines of osteon were observed as 1- 2µm white lines. Conclusively, the present study indicated that cement lines are extracellular matrices of hypercalcified afibrillar layer having 2µm thickness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".