MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070953114 · doi:10.1115/icnmm2008-62031

Development of Unsteady Flow in a Wavy Minichannel System

2008· article· en· W2070953114 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick H. Oosthuizen

Bibliographic record

VenueASME 2008 6th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReynolds numberPrandtl numberMechanicsTurbulencePhysicsOpen-channel flowDimensionless quantityTurbulent Prandtl numberPipe flowGeometryMathematicsHeat transferNusselt number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flow through a minichannel with a square cross-sectional shape whose center-line follows a wavy path has been numerically studied. The wavy center-line path is defined by a series of circular arcs. Now when a fluid flows through such a wavy channel unsteady flow can develop at Reynolds numbers that are far below the value at which transition to turbulence occurs. The development of this unsteadiness can lead to increases in the pressure losses in the channel and to significant increases in the heat transfer rate when the channel wall is heated or cooled. To study the conditions under which unsteady flow develops with a wavy, circular arc center-line shape attention has been given to flow through a channel system in which there is a short straight entrance section followed by a wavy channel section with four full waves followed by a short straight outlet section. It has been assumed that the flow is incompressible and that there is no slip at the channel walls. The unsteady form of the governing equations have been written in dimensionless form and solved using a commercial finite-element based software package, FIDAP. The solution has the following parameters: the Reynolds number, the Prandtl number, and the dimensionless radius of the wavy portion of the channel system. Results have only been obtained for a Prandtl number 0.7 for Reynolds numbers of between 10 and 500 for various dimensionless wave radii. The solution shows that steady exists at low Reynolds numbers but that at a critical Reynolds unsteady flow exists, this critical Reynolds number depending on the dimensionless wave radius. The major concern in this work is with defining the conditions under which this unsteady flow develops and with the effect of the development of this unsteadiness on the pressure drop in the channel system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME 2008 6th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and MinichannelsSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207