MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070964498 · doi:10.1063/1.1355291

An improved decoupled model for spin relaxation in 4-n-alkyloxy-4′-cyanobiphenyls

2001· article· en· W2070964498 on OpenAlexafffund
Ronald Y. Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLiquid crystalRelaxation (psychology)Rotational diffusionHomologous seriesChemistryDielectricDiffusionAlkylDeuteriumChain (unit)Spin (aerodynamics)Nuclear magnetic resonanceThermodynamicsCondensed matter physicsComputational chemistryMolecular physicsChemical physicsMoleculeCrystallographyPhysicsOrganic chemistryAtomic physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An improved decoupled model has recently been proposed by us to account for the correlated internal rotations in flexible alkyl(oxy) chains of liquid crystals. In this model, the three-bond motions in the chain are disallowed, while both gauche migration and gauche pair production can now occur in the chain. Preliminary results from the analysis of deuteron spin relaxation rates in the liquid crystal 4-n-hexyloxy-4′-cyanobiphenyl (6OCB) were encouraging. We apply this motional model to interpret the existing relaxation data of 4-n-octyloxy-4′-cyanobiphenyl and 6OCB. Transition rates for the chain dynamics are obtained for both liquid crystals in conjunction with their overall rotational diffusion constants. The derived rotational diffusion constants are compared with those obtained from dielectric relaxation studies. A consistent picture emerges in the present study for the two members of a homologous series when the order director fluctuations are included in the nematic phases of these liquid crystals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207