MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070970918 · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.03.030

Effect of Fibrates on Lipid Profiles and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review

2009· review· en· W2070970918 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel Abourbih, Kristian B. Filion, Lawrence Joseph, Ernesto L. Schiffrin, Stéphane Rinfret, Paul Poirier, Louise Pilote, Jacques Genest, Mark J. Eisenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Medicine · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria HospitalCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de QuébecJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFibrateInternal medicineOdds ratioPlaceboMyocardial infarctionConfidence intervalHypertriglyceridemiaGemfibrozilStatinCholesterolFenofibrateCardiologyTriglyceridePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.008
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations136
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of MedicineSame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207