MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070971464 · doi:10.1109/pesc.2008.4592156

A new wavelet based diagnosis and protection of faults in induction motor drives

2008· article· en· W2070971464 on OpenAlexaff
M. Abdesh, S. K. Khan, M.A. Rahman

Bibliographic record

VenuePESC record · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduction motorWaveletTrippingWavelet packet decompositionFault (geology)Wavelet transformInverterComputer scienceArtificial neural networkControl theory (sociology)EngineeringVoltageArtificial intelligenceCircuit breakerControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel diagnostic and protection algorithm based on wavelet neural network is developed and implemented in real-time for inverter faults in the vector controlled induction motor drives. The phase currents of an induction motor drive for different faulted and unfaulted conditions are preprocessed by wavelet packet transform in order to minimize the structure and timing of the proposed diagnostic technique. The wavelet packet transformed coefficients of line currents are used as inputs of a three-layer wavelet neural network. The performance of the proposed diagnosis and protection scheme is evaluated by simulation and experimental results. The proposed technique is evaluated and tested on-line for a laboratory 1-hp induction motor drive using the ds1102 digital signal processor board. In all the tests carried out, the type of fault is identified promptly and properly, and the tripping action is initiated almost at the instant or within one cycle of the fault occurrence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePESC recordSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207