MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070991662 · doi:10.1108/13552510310466927

Hierarchical control of production and maintenance rates in manufacturing systems

2003· article· en· W2070991662 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalÉcole de Technologie SupérieurePolytechnique MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreventive maintenanceOptimal controlProduction controlLimitingMathematical optimizationProduction (economics)Reduction (mathematics)Control (management)Optimal maintenanceStochastic controlControl theory (sociology)Production planningEngineeringComputer scienceReliability engineeringMathematicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the production and preventive maintenance planning control problem for a multi‐machine flexible manufacturing system (FMS). A two‐level hierarchical control model is developed according to the discrepancy between the time scale of the discounting cost event and one of the machine state processes. The proposed model extends the classical singular perturbation approach by considering age‐dependent machine failure rates and controlling both production and preventive maintenance rates. We replace the stochastic optimal control problem by a deterministic one termed limiting control problem. With this approach, we compute an age‐dependent near‐optimal control policy of the stochastic initial control problem from the optimal solution of the equivalent limiting control problem. A numerical example is used to illustrate the procedure and to show the reduction of the control problem size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it