MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071058913 · doi:10.1094/pdis-91-8-1029

Temperature-Sensitive <i>Wheat streak mosaic virus</i> Resistance Identified in KS03HW12 Wheat

2007· article· en· W2071058913 on OpenAlexaff
Dallas L. Seifers, T. J. Martin, T. L. Harvey, S. Haber

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAgronomyResistance (ecology)Veterinary medicineHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) infection reduces seed yield and quality in wheat. These losses can be alleviated significantly by exploiting genetic host plant resistance. A new source of temperature-sensitive resistance to WSMV, KS03HW12, and its parental lines (KS97HW29/ KS97HW131//KS96HW100-5) were evaluated in both greenhouse and field conditions. Parental wheat lines were exposed to WSMV pressure under different temperatures in growth chambers to determine the stability of the resistance, and 2 years of field yield trials were conducted to confirm effectiveness. To determine the effectiveness of its resistance against a spectrum of isolates, KS03HW12 was tested against six different WSMV isolates of different geographic origins. Among the three pedigree parents, only one, KS97HW29, was resistant. The parental lines of KS97HW29 are not available for testing; therefore, the presumed origin of the resistance could not be further confirmed. None of the six tested WSMV isolates systemically infected KS03HW12 at 18°C. Yield of KS03HW12 in field tests was not different from healthy controls. Thus, the elite winter wheat KS03HW12 appears to be a stable and effective source of temperature-sensitive resistance to WSMV and should be useful for wheat breeding programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207