MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071163486 · doi:10.1103/physreve.74.031609

Multiscale model for microstructure evolution in multiphase materials: Application to the growth of isolated inclusions in presence of elasticity

2006· article· en· W2071163486 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomogeneousAnisotropyInstabilityMicrostructureCritical radiusLattice (music)Materials scienceCondensed matter physicsThermodynamicsPhysicsStatistical physicsMechanicsMathematicsGeometryOpticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a multiscale model based on the classical lattice time-dependent density-functional theory to study microstructure evolution in multiphase systems. As a first test of the method, we study the static and dynamic properties of isolated inclusions. Three cases are explored: elastically homogeneous systems, elastically inhomogeneous systems with soft inclusions, and elastically inhomogeneous systems with hard inclusions. The equilibrium properties of inclusions are shown to be consistent with previous results: both homogeneous and hard inclusions adopt a circular shape independent of their size, whereas soft inclusions are circular below a critical radius and elliptic above. In all cases, the Gibbs-Thomson relation is obeyed, except for a change in the prefactor at the critical radius in soft inclusions. Under growth conditions, homogeneous inclusions exhibit a Mullins-Sekerka shape instability [W. Mullins and R. Sekerka, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 323 (1963)], whereas in inhomogeneous systems, the growth of perturbations follows the Leo-Sekerka model [P. Leo and R. Sekerka, Acta Metall. 37, 3139 (1989)]. For soft inclusions, the mode instability regime is gradually replaced by a tip-growing mechanism, which leads to stable, strongly out-of-equilibrium shapes even at very low supersaturation. This mechanism is shown to significantly affect the growth dynamics of soft inclusions, whereas dynamical corrections to the growth rates are negligible in homogeneous and hard inclusions. Finally, due to its microscopic formulation, the model is shown to automatically take into account phenomena caused by the presence of the underlying discrete lattice: anisotropy of the interfacial energy, anisotropy of the kinetics, and preferential excitation of shape perturbations commensurate with the rotational symmetry of the lattice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it