Pluriethnicité, citoyenneté et intégration : de la souveraineté pour lever les obstacles et les ambiguïtés
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de ce texte est de montrer en quoi la politique québécoise d’intégration des membres des groupes ethnoculturels minoritaires est problématique dans le cadre du statut politique actuel du Québec. Elle est en partie court-circuitée par l’approche privilégiée par le gouvernement fédéral qui fait la promotion du caractère bilingue et multiculturel du Canada. Sont ainsi créés de nombreux obstacles à l’endroit de la politique québécoise d’intégration et de la valorisation de la langue française, pilier de la culture publique commune. L’approche québécoise entre en contradiction avec la représentation de la « nation » qui est mise de l’avant par le Canada, empêchant la consolidation de la citoyenneté québécoise et d’un sentiment d’appartenance à la société nationale québécoise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.049 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".