MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071180302 · doi:10.7202/041655ar

Le théâtre irlandais à Toronto et à Montréal : du cliché identitaire à l’appropriation artistique

2010· article· fr· W2071180302 on OpenAlex
Lisa Fitzpatrick, Joël Beddows

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueL’Annuaire théâtral Revue québécoise d’études théâtrales · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesAppropriationArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’introduction et l’appropriation du théâtre irlandais, en anglais à Toronto et en français à Montréal sont comparées : manifestement, certains praticiens résistent à la spécificité des oeuvres abordées et s’appuient sur les clichés de l’identité irlandaise pour assurer leur réception, tandis que d’autres puisent dans la « différence » intrinsèque aux oeuvres de Mark O’Rowe, Marina Carr et Brian Friel. Dans un processus d’appropriation du théâtre irlandais au Québec, il est étonnant de constater que la traduction interlinguistique assure le respect de la spécificité esthétique des oeuvres abordées, phénomène qui contredit la logique traditionnelle qui veut qu’un tel processus implique surtout des pertes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it