MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071195019 · doi:10.1061/40976(316)209

Use of CFD Modeling for Creating Recreational Opportunities at the Calgary Bow River Weir

2008· article· en· W2071195019 on OpenAlexaffabout
Fangbiao Lin, Darren Shepherd, Chuck Slack, S. T. Shipley, Al Nilson

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsKlohn Crippen Berger (Canada)Department of Transportation, Infrastructure and EnergyVanguard College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeirComputational fluid dynamicsHydraulic jumpVolume of fluid methodEnvironmental scienceHydraulic engineeringHydraulic structureMarine engineeringChannel (broadcasting)Hydrology (agriculture)Flow (mathematics)EngineeringGeotechnical engineeringMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008Same topicHydraulic flow and structuresFrench-language works237,207