World conference on medical education: A window on the globalizing world of medical education?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) is a worldwide association for all interested in medical and health professions education (http://www.amee.org). AMEE organizes an annual meeting, the most recent of which (2005) was held in Amsterdam. At this meeting certain countries and regions were better represented than others, while some countries with large populations or a significant role in the history of medical education were almost completely absent from the international scene. At the same time, the themes addressed at the AMEE conference concern issues of international interest, and appear to be leading to internationalization of pedagogical and research methods and policies for educational standards. It is therefore crucial that all parts of the medical education world be well represented. This paper illustrates both the strengths and imbalances of AMEE as a forum for the elaboration of international activities and standards in medical education. Finally, the authors wonder why a tendency to assume international generalizability of concepts and perspectives in medical education is not accompanied by studies that compare and contrast medical education methods, research and values between countries and cultures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.154 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".