MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071253897 · doi:10.5539/ass.v4n2p42

Designs of Simplicity and Reality

2008· article· en· W2071253897 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Siyu Bao

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimplicityComputer scienceDesign languageReflection (computer programming)Architectural engineeringHuman–computer interactionEngineeringEpistemologyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As is well known, design is human oriented. Then, how can we realize human oriented when designing? The products are not made by way of designers’ imagination; rather various design elements of the circumstance are integrated into the products so that the products are teemed with meanings. In modern society, the industrial products flood our life and various and mixed designs make us dazing. How to push modern design to move towards simplicity and reality is a question that deserves each designer’s reflection. “Simplicity” refers to that a design must have explicit aim and solve the comparatively simplex problem; and the design language must be clear and express and the shape be unsophisticated. “Reality” refers to rational design concept and attitude and the maneuverability of the design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207